Skip to main content

tv   President Trump Meets With South Korean Leader  CSPAN  May 23, 2018 7:49am-8:25am EDT

7:49 am
c-span was created as a public service. and today we continue to bring you unfiltered coverage of congress. in public policy events in washington dc. brought you by the cable and satellite provider. with the two leaders that spoke with reporters. with the north korean president and international trade. and that meeting with deputy attorney general. it's a great honor to have president of south korea with us we become great friends
7:50 am
over the years. we now had known each other for quite some time. no matter how big trade is. we have with a very big trade arrangement that we are renegotiating right now is south korea. we will have some pretty good news on trade in we will be discussing other things but the big topic will be singapore and the meeting and see what happens. and if it doesn't that's okay too. whatever it is it is. i look forward to spending quite a bit of time with the president and i think a lot of
7:51 am
good things will happen. [inaudible conversations] [indiscernible]
7:52 am
[foreign language] [foreign language].
7:53 am
[foreign language] think you mr. president for your warm hospitality and sharing much of your time with me. i know you have a very busy domestic calendar as well as the all-important north korea u.s. summit.
7:54 am
thanks to your vision of achieving peace. can we find ourselves standing one step closer to the dream of it being able to complete that. nobody had been able to achieve in the decades past. the faith in the future and as such there will be none. >> i do think he's serious.
7:55 am
i think he would like to see that happen. at the same time he's going into a feature that he's going into that. with where things stand at the summit. the national security adviser seems to think that things are on track. that this will indeed happen. and will see what happens. if we don't we don't have a meeting. frankly it has a chance to have a great meeting for north korea. we will see. we are talking the meeting scheduled on june 12 in singapore and whether or not it happens it will be knowing pretty soon.
7:56 am
i very strong idea and opinions on the subject. north korea has a chance to be a great country. and it can be a great country under the circumstances that they are living right now. north korea has a chance to be a great country. i think they should seize the opportunity we will soon find out whether or not they want to do that. have you spoken to kim jung un? >> there's no reason to discuss that. for a short. of time we had been dealing with north korea and it has been a good experience. they're very happy. i can only speak for a very short. of time will see how long it
7:57 am
continues to work. can you tell us more about the meeting with rob rosenstein. the congress would like to see documents opened up. a lot of people are saying they had spies in my campaign. that would be one of the biggest. it would make every political event ever look like small potatoes. we want to make sure that there weren't. some men get paid based got paid based on what i read in the newspapers that's not a normal situation the kind of money you're talking about. the department of justice wants to get that.
7:58 am
hopefully they will all be be able to get together. setting up a meeting between congress in the various representatives and they will be able to open up documents and take a look and find out what happens. during my campaign for political purposes that would be unprecedented in the history of our country. seamen can you give an update on that. president she and i gni there is no deal. we will see what happens. we are discussing deals in various deals. where we can to say look this is what we want and this is what we think is fair. if a negotiated deal doesn't work out. we lost $500 billion a year for many years and then it
7:59 am
varied from a hundred billion dollars to $500 billion. when you're losing $500 billion a year you can't lose in terms of negotiation. it's really easy to win. i want this to be a great deal for the united states. they may not be possible. the president asked me to look into it and i'm doing that. and don't forget for the ones that say og may be trump is getting a little bit easy we close it. and was another administration. at the phone company for those that don't know. a very large phone company but it's also a phone company that has a large portion of the parts that make up these phones that are sold all over the world from american companies.
8:00 am
you're really you are really hurting american companies. and looking at it but we were the ones that closed it. it was done by us. we will see what happens. as a favorite to the president i am absolutely taking a look at it a lot of the stories on trade were incorrectly lit. .. .. >> mr. president, do you have confidence in rod rosenstein? >> what's your next question, please? >> i'm a reporter from -- >> excuse me, i have the president of south korea here, okay? >> yes, i have a question on -- >> he doesn't want to hear these questions, if you don't mind.
8:01 am
>> president trump, i'm a reporter from south korea. how much confidence and trust do you have in my president in playing the mediator role in resolving this north korea issue and the denuclearization process? >> i have great confidence in your president. i think that he's brought a different perspective to the talks with north korea. he wants to be able to make a deal. now, you've had some very hardline administrations, and you have president moon, and you've had others before president moon, who also had more or less this attitude. i think he's a very capable person. i think he's an extremely competent man. i think he's a very good person. and i think he wants to have what's good for the korean peninsula, not just north or south, for the entire korean peninsula. so i have tremendous confidence in president moon. and i think that his way, the way he is, really is helping us to potentially make a deal. whether the deal gets made or not, who knows. it's a deal. who knows. you never know about deals. if you go into deals that are 100% certain, it doesn't happen. if you go into deals that have
8:02 am
no chance, and it happens, and sometimes happens easily. i've made a lot of deals. i know deals, i think, better than anybody knows deals. you never really know. and that's why i say to you. but i will tell you, this is a good man and he is a very capable man. and i think south korea is very lucky to have him. do you want to interpret that for him, so he can hear? because, you know, he's not hearing what we're doing here. go ahead. wait, we'll just let that be interpreted. [speaking in native tongue]
8:03 am
[speaking in native tongue] did i do a good job? i can't do better than that. that's called an a-plus rating, right? i can't do better -- okay, we'll take a couple more. go ahead. >> mr. president, what are your conditions for meeting with kim jong-un? you said you had -- >> well, i'd rather not say. but we are working on something. and, you know, there's a chance
8:04 am
that it will work out. there's a chance, there's a very substantial chance it won't work out. i don't want to waste a lot of time, and i'm sure he doesn't want to waste a lot of time. so there's a very substantial chance that it won't work out, and that's okay. that doesn't mean it won't work out over a period of time. but it may not work out for june 12th. but there's a good chance that we'll have the meeting. >> mr. president, if i could ask you and president moon this question. in terms of denuclearization, should it be an all-in-one? or could it be incremental, with incentives along the way for kim jong-un to denuclearize? >> well, all in one would be nice, i can tell you. i'm not going to go beyond that. it would certainly be better if it were all in one. does it have to be? i don't think i want to totally commit myself. but all in one would be a lot better. [speaking in native tongue]
8:05 am
or at least for physical reasons, over a very short period of time. you know, you do have some physical reasons that it may not be able to do exactly that. so for physical reasons, over a very short period of time. essentially, that would be all in one. >> president trump, i'm a reporter from south korea. if north korea and kim jong-un decide cvid, will you literally guarantee the safety of the regime of north korea? >> i will guarantee his safety. yes, we will guarantee his safety. and we've talked about that from the beginning. he will be safe. he will be happy. his country will be rich. his country will be hardworking and very prosperous. they're very great people.
8:06 am
they're hardworking, great people. look at what happened with south korea. don't forget, we helped south korea. we have spent trillions of dollars, not billions, trillions of dollars over many, many years. we helped south korea. and south korea is one of the most incredible countries in terms of what they do. you know that. that's what you are. that's where you're from. same people. same people. so, yeah, i think that he will be extremely happy if something works out. and if it doesn't work out, honestly, he can't be happy. but he has a chance to do something that maybe has never been done before. and i think it would be, if you look 25 years into the future, 50 years into the future, he will be able to look back and be very proud of what he did for north korea and, actually, for the world. but he will be very proud of what he did for north korea.
8:07 am
8:08 am
>> and just to finish that, because it's a very important question, south korea, china, and japan, and i've spoken to all three, one i happen to have right here, they will be willing to help and, i believe, invest very, very large sums of money into helping to make north korea great.
8:09 am
>> mr. president, what do you want to hear from president moon about his own summit with kim jong-un? what can he tell you as you're preparing for the meeting in singapore? >> well, that's what we're here for. he's going to tell me. he's got his own meetings that he's had. we're going to discuss that. he may have a meeting coming up; he may not. the word is that he may not. it may be directly with us. it may go directly to us in singapore, or it may be at a later date. but that's one of the reasons that he's here, to talk about that. >> is there is anything you want to ask him specifically that you can tell us? >> nothing. no. we speak a lot on the phone. this should not be that long a meeting, actually. >> you mean president moon may have a meeting with kim jong-un instead of yourself? >> he may or may not. he may or may not. right now he doesn't know whether or not he has a meeting. but he may or may not have a meeting with kim jong-un.
8:10 am
>> mr. president, are you pleased with how the trade talks with china went? >> no, not really. i think that they're a start, but we need something, look, china has been, i really call it a dereliction of duties. that if you look at it, it's called, in the military, they'd say it's dereliction of duty. what happened to our country, that our representatives allowed other countries, and i'm not just talking about china. china is the big one, to take advantage of us on trade the way we've been taken advantage of. so china, as an example, has made a fortune.
8:11 am
i mean, a transfer of wealth like nobody has ever seen in history. they're the big one. they're almost all bad, but china is the big one. so, no, i'm not satisfied, but we'll see what happens. we have a long way to go. but i wanted to go fairly quickly. you know, you're talking about numbers like that; you're talking about billions of dollars a week. okay? so when they say, oh, let's meet in a couple of weeks. oh, that's $2 billion, right? i view it that way. you know, we're talking about billions of dollars a week that we suffer, we lose. and so we're looking to go quickly. i will say i'm a little disappointed, because when kim jong-un had the meeting with president xi, in china, the second meeting, the first meeting we knew about the second meeting, i think there was a little change in attitude from kim jong-un. so i don't like that. i don't like that. i don't like it from the standpoint of china. now, i hope that's not true, because we have, i have a great
8:12 am
relationship with president xi. he's a friend of mine. he likes me. i like him. we have, i mean, that was two of the great days of my life being in china. it was, i don't think anybody has ever been treated better in china, ever in their history. and i just think it was, many of you were there, it was an incredible thing to witness and see. and we built a very good relationship. we speak a lot. but there was a difference when kim jong-un left china the second time. and i think they were dedicating an aircraft carrier that the united states paid for. because we paid for it. >> do you think china had a role in that? >> that was built in china. >> do you think china maybe discouraged kim from having the summit? >> no, but i think that president xi is a world-class poker player. and i'd probably, maybe, doing the same thing that he would do. but i will say this. there was a somewhat different attitude after that meeting, and i'm a little surprised. now, maybe nothing happened. i'm not blaming anybody, but i'm
8:13 am
just saying, maybe nothing happened and maybe it did. but there was different attitude by the north korean folks when, after that meeting. so i don't think it was a great meeting. nobody knew about the meeting, and all of a sudden it was reported that he was in china a second time. the first time everybody knew about. the second time it was like a surprise. and i think things changed after that meeting. so i can't say that i'm happy about it. okay?
8:14 am
>> now, president moon may have a different opinion. i would like to have your opinion on that, what you thought of the second meeting with president xi. what is your feeling? you may have an opinion.
8:15 am
>> and i don't want to get him in trouble. he lives right next to china. you know, he's not too far away. [speaking in native tongue] >> translator: >> well, first of all, i am very much aware that there are many skeptical views within the united states about whether the upcoming u.s.-north korea summit
8:16 am
will truly be successful and whether the complete denuclearization of north korea will be realized. [speaking in native tongue] but i don't think there will be positive developments in history if we just assume that because it all failed in the past, it will fail again. [speaking in native tongue] >> translator: there have been many agreements between the united states and north korea previously, but this will be the first time that there will be an agreement between the leaders. [speaking in native tongue] >> translator: and, moreover, the person who is in charge is president trump. [speaking in native tongue] >> translator: and president trump has been
8:17 am
able to achieve this dramatic and positive change that you see right now. [speaking in native tongue] >> translator: and i have every confidence that president trump will be able to achieve a historic feat of making the upcoming u.s.-north korea summit successful and end the korean war that had been
8:18 am
lasting for the past 65 years, and also, along the way, achieve complete denuclearization of north korea, establish a permanent peace regime on the korean peninsula, and also normalize relations between the united states and north korea. i have every confidence that he will be able to make a historic turnaround in this sense. and i will spare no effort to provide all necessary support. [speaking in native tongue] >> translator: and i believe that all of this will lead to a great thing, that it will also guarantee the security of the north korean regime, and also promise peace and prosperity for north korea as well. >> mr. president, do you believe that president xi is committed to peace and committed to north korea's denuclearization? >> i would like to think so. i hope so. i mean, we're dealing mostly on
8:19 am
trade. but you see, when i'm dealing on trade, i have many other things in mind also. every time i talk to china about trade, i'm thinking about the border. because that border is a very important element in what we're doing. it has been cut off largely, but it's been opened up a little bit lately. i don't like that. i don't like that. so we have a very powerful hand on trade. and when i'm thinking about trade, you know, i read you folks, and you say, well, why doesn't he, there's a much bigger picture that i have in mind. trade has always been a very important element in my life, in talking about other countries ripping off the united states. i've been watching them do it for 35 years. i've been watching them do that for so many years. and nothing has changed, other than over the last 15, 20 years it's gotten worse. and it's not just china. but when i think of trade with china, i'm also thinking about what they're doing to help us
8:20 am
with peace with north korea. that's a very important element. so we'll see how it all works out. but in the end, it will work out. can't tell you exactly how or why, but it always does. it's going to work out. okay? thank you all. john, you have one more? go ahead. >> one more, sir. i'm just wondering, what is your vision for the long game with north korea? is it two koreas peacefully coexisting? or would you like to see reunification at some point down the road? >> well, i think what's going to happen is you'll start off, certainly, with two koreas. and then it's going to be largely up to them as to whether or not they get together. you know, that border was artificially imposed many, many years ago, and imposed, to a certain extent and to a very large extent, by us. it's an artificial border, but it's a border that nevertheless, it took seed, and that's what you have. i would say that we are looking, certainly, right now, at two
8:21 am
koreas. two very successful koreas. you're going to have a very, very successful north korea, and you're going to have a very successful, and you already do, south korea. i mean, south korea was in condition that was as bad as north korea many years ago, when they started this great experiment that worked out so well for them. now, you look at samsung and lg, and the ships that they're building, and what they're doing. it's incredible. when i was over there, i flew over plants that are incredible. what they have done is incredible. so i see two koreas, and then ultimately, maybe someday in the future, it wouldn't be now, but someday in the future, maybe they'll get together and you'll go back to one korea. and that would be okay with me, too, as long as they both wanted that. thank you all very much. thank you. yeah, go ahead. >> you mentioned that you were looking into zte, as a favor to president xi. >> i am, yes. >> how do you anticipate that ending up? >> well, again, zte buys a tremendous amount of equipment and parts for their telephones.
8:22 am
they're, as you know, the fourth largest in the world. and they buy them from american companies. so immediately, when i looked at it, it was my administration that closed them down. but when i looked at it, i said, you know, they can pay a big price without necessarily damaging all of these american companies, which they are, because, you know, you're talking about tremendous amounts of money and jobs to american companies. so i envision a very large fine. i envision, perhaps, new management, new board of directors, very tight security rules. but we caught them doing bad things. we caught them, not anybody else. we caught them doing bad things, and we essentially made it so difficult that it was shut down. by shutting them down, we're hurting a lot of american companies, really good american companies. and i will tell you, don't think that we didn't hear from them by shutting down this massive phone company. so what i envision is a very
8:23 am
large fine of more than a billion dollars. could be a billion-three. i envision a new management, a new board, and very, very strict security rules. and i also envision that they will have to buy a big percentage of their parts and equipment from american companies. okay? thank you all very much. thank you. thank you. [shouting] >> a house subcommittee hearing on sexual abuse and misconduct in the u.s. olympic team unity with testimony from that of u.s. olympic committee and leaders of the u.s. swimming and gymnastics programs. we will surely part of that on c-span2 while we wait for the senate to gavel in at 11 eastern.
8:24 am
>> this marks great skill as a grand strategist. once he knew the advantages of shock and awe, and this is how he unified germany in the 1860s, wars with denmark, austria, hungary and eventually france itself, started than himself. but then having done that and having achieved is objective which was the unification of germany, he stopped and he became a consolidator rather than an instigator, and his next 20 years in power as german chancellor were devoted to trying to build reassuring alliances to build kind of a web of alliances with all of germany's neighbors so they would get used to the idea of a unified germany. so there's that distinction between shock and awe, and then knowing when to stop and do something else, reassurance. >> professor john


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on